MAX BRODEL (1870-1941): HIS ARTISTIC INFLUENCE ON SURGICAL
LEARNING
AT JOHN HOPKINS MEDICAL SCHOOL
by Pia Pace-Asciak, B.A., H.B.Sc., M.A.Sc.
Summer 2006

 |
Preface
The power of illustration has been known well before
paper was invented whereby ancient Egyptians, Babylonians, Chinese
and Indians recorded medically related illustrations on stone, bamboo,
silk and metal (1,2,3). Often the written word fails to communicate
certain information that pictures easily convey. Throughout history,
artists and anatomists such as Leonardo DaVinci or Vesalius have
united art and medicine to communicate the details of human anatomy.
A more recent example, Max Brodel, is someone whose work had the
stamp of artistic competence and the accuracy of a clinician. His
work served an invaluable tool for educating students about anatomy,
physiology and surgical procedures.
Medical illustration is a highly difficult skill
to master. Often the work is generated by an artist without medical
training, or by doctors with limited artistic skills. This paper
will discuss how Brodel worked hard to strike a balance between
having sufficient medically based knowledge and artistic skill.
This paper explores Brodel’s early training in Leipzig Germany,
and the evolution of his career at Johns Hopkins Medical School.
This topic was of personal interest since it bridges
my previous experience as an art student, with my current experience
learning anatomy and surgery as a medical student. My interest in
this field developed during a summer elective in Otolaryngology
when my drawing skills came in handy for a surgeon who wanted a
specific rendition of the neurovascular structures in the suprahyoid
region of the neck. This project made me appreciate the importance
of illustration, and its advantages compared to photography for
directing surgical learning. A drawing may not tell the whole story
the way a photograph can, but it can highlight the important features
of a structure for teaching or discussion purposes. Despite the
technical advancements made in imaging, illustration remains a vital
tool for selectively communicating disease processes.

|
 |
 |
Introduction
‘A picture is worth a thousand words’
(4). Confucius’ expression aptly applies to the field of medical
illustration. Images have the ability to bypass language barriers
and jargon that may hinder the fluidity of expression. There is
no denying the importance of medical illustration in the early training
of future surgeons for teaching procedures. According to Ludwig
Choulant, a well known expert on the history of medical illustration,
“the figuration of the anatomic form of man by the graphic
arts aims either to make the teaching of human anatomy more plastic
for the anatomist and physiologist, engraving it on the memory,
or to give the plastic artist a clear, scientific basis for his
studies of the human figure”(5). In other words, according
to Thomas Jones, Professor of Medical and Dental Illustration; “Medical
illustration can be defined as the graphic representation of any
medical subject made for the purpose of communicating medical knowledge”
(6).
Medical students depend on illustration to learn
anatomical facts and details that may be too subtle for the written
or spoken word. For surgical disciplines, learners rely on tools
such as language, 2-dimensional illustrations, and 3-dimensional
models to pass on important concepts. Although a photograph can
convey factual information, illustration can highlight and educate
the pertinent details for understanding surgical procedures, neurovascular
structures, and the pathological disease processes (7).
Often, medical professionals, residents, and students
hear the words anatomical illustration and reflexively think of
Frank Netter (1906-1991) (8). Few however, are aware of an earlier
figure Max Brodel (1870-1941), a German-raised artist who eventually
immigrated to the United States to pursue his career as a medical
illustrator. He became recognized as one of America’s most
distinguished medical illustrators, who greatly improved the standards
of surgical illustration. However, while Brodel may be considered
the father of medical illustration, he was not the first to study
anatomy for reasons other than purely art.
Leonardo DaVinci (1452-1519) is the most famous
example of an artist who devoted 20 years of his life to anatomical
studies and drawings of skeleton, muscular, nervous and vascular
system, in addition to the development of the human fetus with depth,
precision and fine detail (9)a . His work is all the more remarkable
when one considers that he had no reference material of any kind
other than the human body itself to guide him (10). Historical accounts
of his work explain how he studied both structure and function in
depth, through observation and careful dissection. According to
DaVinci, by drawing various joints, muscles and bones from different
angles, “it gave complete and accurate conceptions of the
various shapes such as neither ancient nor modern writers have ever
been able to give without an infinitely tedious and confused proclivity
of writing and of time” (11,12).
Brodel learned medicine in Baltimore by reading
medical texts, performing numerous dissections of cadavers, and
working under the guidance of gynecologist Dr.Howard Kelly (1858-1943).
Brodel’s dedication led to his creation of artistic techniques
that revolutionized the appearance of medical illustration and made
illustrated tissue seem alive. After years working as an illustrator
at Johns Hopkins University, in 1911, Brodel became the head of
the first Department of Art as Applied to Medicine (13). The establishment
of this department led to the professionalization of illustration
and the subsequent development of the Association of Medical
Illustrators in 1946 (14). In collaboration with various physicians,
Brodel developed hundreds of drawings for educating surgeons in
Obstetrics and Gynecology, and later Urology, and Otolaryngology.
In order to understand the current role of medical
illustration in education, one needs to look to the past to see
how art has helped solve communication dilemmas when learning medicine.
To do this, the artistic training of Max Brodel will be discussed
as well as the contributions he made to medical illustration at
Johns Hopkins University in the twentieth century. In addition,
the changes that have occurred with computer technology will be
compared to a century ago, when illustrations were used for teaching
anatomy since cadavers were not always available on demand. Moreover,
medical illustration served as employment for artists. Today, animated
computer based art is synergistically used with medical illustration
to educate students about anatomy.
_______________
a. Leonardo, through his superb draftsmanship produced a series
of aesthetic and instructive anatomic studies. His drawings show
accurate anatomic structure and suggest function as well.

|
 |
 |
Max Brodel’s training
with Dr.Ludwig Max Brodel’s art training conformed
to a late 19th Century fine arts education that focused on precision
and mastery that was characteristically German. During his vacations
and upon graduation from the Leipzig Academy of Fine Arts, Brodel
worked on gross anatomical and histological drawings for Dr.Carl
Ludwig, the Director of the Institute of Physiology at the University
of Leipzig in 1888. Dr.Ludwig was a brilliant physiologist who advanced
original evidence on how the kidney acts as a filter (15). Shortly
thereafter, he gave a new interpretation of renal function (16).
His research also focused on lymph formation, glandular secretion,
nervous control of blood pressure and capillary blood pressure.
During the eighteen months that Brodel spent in Ludwig’s laboratory,
he developed what later became his credo. In one of his diary entries
he wrote:
“I did not know then that the only way to plan a picture
is to leave paper and pencil alone until the mind has grasped
the meaning of the object ….Copying a medical object is
not medical illustrating. The camera copies as well, and often
better, than the eye and hand….in medical drawing full comprehension
must precede execution” (17).
Ludwig was Brodel’s first mentor and helped nurture his future
artistic and scientific knowledge (18). According to the literature,
it is not clear on what basis Brodel was put forward by the school’s
director to work in Ludwig’s laboratory during the summer
of 1888 (19). Brodel was either recognized for his skilled draftsmanship,
or perhaps, he was one of only a few who showed an interest in physiology.
According to one source, his wife Ruth believed that Max sought
the job because he needed the money to continue art school (20).
The wide-eyed eighteen year old Max had little training in science,
except for a course in artistic anatomy he took in art school that
included lectures and demonstrations of dissections by medical students.
However, the chief lecturer, famed for his research of the mitochondria
was uninterested in teaching gross anatomy (21). Thus, working in
Ludwig’s lab enabled Brodel to gain an understanding about
cellular structures, and physiological processes such as lymph formation,
glandular secretion, nervous control of blood pressure and capillary
blood pressure (22). Through Ludgwig, Brodel grasped the basis of
physiology which later provided some of the groundwork for his career
at Johns Hopkins Medical School.
Ludwig was internationally known and attracted numerous physicians
and scientists from abroad. This gave Brodel the opportunity to
meet several influential physicians, notably Franklin Mall (1862-1917),
a visiting anatomy professor and future head of the anatomy department
at Johns Hopkins Medical School in America, who convinced Brodel
that his future lay in Baltimore. Mall went to Leipzig to study
anatomy and embryology with Wilhelm His and then became a student
of Ludwig’s for one year where he studied the villi of intestines
(23,24). William Henry Welch (1850-1934), the professor of pathology
and the Dean of Johns Hopkins Medical School, who was responsible
for bringing together the original of Faculty of Medicine, also
played a role in recruiting Brodel and Mall to Baltimoreb
. Welch knew Mall prior to meeting him in Ludwig’s laboratory
since Mall had been his first fellow in pathology. It was in 1894
when Ludwig became ill and was nearing the end of his life that
Mall persuaded Brodel to become an illustrator at the newly opened
Johns Hopkins Medical School (25).
_______________
b. William Henry Welch was the moving force behind the great revolution
that took place in American medicine between 1880 and 1930. A distinguished
pathologist, teacher and humanitarian, Welch was responsible for
the introduction of European developments in bacteriology and pathology
into the United States, and for the advancement of medical education
throughout the country.

|
 |
 |
Max Brodel’s transition to America
Upon arriving in Baltimore, Brodel found that Dr.
Mall was occupied with administrative duties. According to Crosby
and Cody, Mall took Brodel to meet Dr.Howard Kelly, Professor and
Chair of the Gynecology department who was working on his first
book, “Operative Gynecology”. Shortly after his arrival,
Brodel found himself taking on the formidable task of illustrating
the first volume of Kelly’s “Operative Gynecology”.
Every morning, Brodel reported to the hospital where Kelly explained
what he wanted through simple line drawings. From then on, Brodel
acquired most of his medical knowledge on his own. Brodel became
a prolific reader of the medical literature. He also spent hours
dissecting cadavers so he could fully understand his subjects and
the physiology underlying the structure prior drawing them (26,
27)c .
For Brodel, acquiring medical knowledge required
hours of observation in the operating and autopsy rooms with little
guidance. Ruth Brodel’s biographical sketch comments on her
husband’s dedication to his profession:
“Long hours of painstaking studies were
necessary for Max to fit him for his work, and in doing so he
laid the foundation of a masterful knowledge of anatomy. He was
a keen observer of every detail, and had such a retentive memory
that he could reproduce on paper what he had seen and observed”
(28)d .
Often Brodel had to find creative ways to represent difficult anatomical
structures in the absence of model or cadavers for dissecting. Tom
Cullen (1868-1953), a surgeon and friend would “assume the
position” when it was not possible to locate a suitable model
for a particular illustration of a woman in the knee-chest posture
with her buttocks in the air. Max would then have to transform Tom’s
muscular buttocks into something “graceful and feminine”
(29). Despite the limitations Brodel faced, Cullen describes Brodel
as a skillful illustrator: “no other man who ever lived has
done as much to improve the beauty and accuracy of medical illustration….”
(30).
Brodel dissected human bodies without using gloves so he could
fully understand his subjects (31). According to Crosby and Cody,
rubber gloves were introduced a decade earlier (32). Brodel developed
a streptococcus infection on the ulnar side of his left hand (fortunately
not his dominant right hand) after mistakenly cutting himself while
dissecting an infected cadaver. After four surgeries by the great
neurosurgeon Harvey Cushing (1869-1939), and some recovery time,
Brodel’s hand improved. Cushing studied surgery under the
guidance of the father of American surgery, William Steward Halsted
(1852-1922), at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. During recovery, Brodel
was fascinated by the loss of sensation in his hand and took to
studying ulnar nerve injury. With a pair of forceps, he applied
light pressure to different areas on his hands to map out the areas
of sensation loss due to ulnar nerve damage. After several drawings
on “progress note” paper that physicians use to make
notes on patients, Brodel drew the regions of the hand that are
supplied by the ulnar nerve (Figure 1) (33). A century
later, we can still learn from Brodel’s misfortune.
Under Dr.Kelly’s guidance, Brodel was able to complete 154
illustrations for the first volume of ‘Operative Gynecology’
in 1898. Brodel’s talents were apparent to everyone at Johns
Hopkins from the beginning. Crosby and Cody state that “he
appears, in every way, to have been treated by the younger men as
one of them, as their equal” despite the absence of a medical
degree (34)e .
Kelly was described as a born teacher who could speak the artist’s
visual language through his own modest sketches. Kelly conveyed
gynecological knowledge by sketching operative procedures that could
not easily be obtained from reading a medical text. In a biography
of Brodel’s early relationship with Kelly, he remarks; “Dr.Kelly
had the remarkable gift of explaining with sketches. In a few but
simple graphic lines he could show all the new ideas in connection
with his operative work”(35). There is no question that Dr.Kelly’s
genius for visualization and for sketching paved the way for Brodel’s
career as a medical artist (35).
Kelly’s religious beliefs dictated how he practiced medicine
(36). He was a fundamentalist Christian and he held a prayer meeting
before every operation sometimes reading the Bible in its original
Greek and Hebrew (37). He believed, by charging high fees to the
wealthy and treating the poor for nothing, his good Christian faith
would open the doors to heaven for him. His life was devoted to
missionaries, private charities, campaigns to close houses of prostitution,
and shelters for women making him a ‘life long moral crusader’
(38). Kelly wrote about his strong beliefs in the Bible and God:
“I believe the Bible to be God’s word, because as
I use it day by day as spiritual food...It is as really food for
spirit as bread is for the body…Perhaps one of my strongest
reasons for believing the Bible is that it reveals to me, as no
other book in the world could do, that which appeals to be a physician,
a diagnosis of my spiritual condition” (39)f
.
Kelly’s spiritual beliefs, in turn, may have influenced Brodel’s
work. The artist used delicate, clean and intricate lines with a
soft, subtle tone which conveyed a sense of innocence (Figure
2). This served to soften the stark female anatomy of the urethra,
vagina and bladder. Moreover, the halftone effects create a striking
balance between light and dark shadows which are reminiscent of
the battle Kelly had with prostitution and reform. Overall, the
use of black and white tones created a dramatic mood or a sense
of impending doom that lurked in the shadowy folds of every woman’s
tissue. In some respects, Brodel’s art was a vehicle for visually
depicting everything that Kelly stood for.
Medical illustration became an important tool for educating students,
in part due to the paucity of cadavers for teaching anatomy. In
a Johns Hopkins Society meeting (1907), Dr.Kelly lectured to the
faculty members about the challenges faced when teaching anatomy:
“….picture yourselves at this present theatre crowded
with students ready for anatomy demonstration. No one is absent,
for it is the greatest day of the year, that on which the dissection
of the one corpse (per student) allowed yearly will be made”
(40). Cats, dogs, and even monkeys were used when nothing else was
available to demonstrate human anatomy, but provided an oversimplification
of what really existed.
Grave robbing for learning human anatomy remained a problem in
the late nineteenth century. Even though, according to Kelly, ‘the
price of gaining such knowledge was prison’, Kelly went on
to say that ‘relatives were being auctioned off before they
had even died’ (41). There are several accounts of bodies
being sold for a mere $15.00 and graves being exhumed when people
died of unknown diseases (42). As a result, police were forced to
deal with gangs of professional “resurrectionists” whose
ranks included medical students (43)g .
It was common for Kelly to receive letters written by people willing
to offer their body to medicine in exchange for money: “…I
may be of some use to you after I am dead and gone, I think it better
for a college to have my remains as it may be a lesson that a good
many young and old doctors have never witnessed before. I agree
to give my remains. I believe the college ought to give me $106
for my remains in advance….” (44). Under these circumstances,
Brodel’s talents as an illustrator were invaluable.
Without cadavers to aid in the demonstration of pelvic anatomy,
Kelly recognized that teaching gynecology was problematic. First,
it was not in the best interest of the patient to have numerous
students in the room during their clinical visit. Second, there
was only so much knowledge that a surgeon could impart using the
blackboard to explain clinical cases. In an article Kelly wrote
describing the methods of teaching gynecology, he states: “I
believe that gynecology is, as a rule, very badly taught, and the
medical student gains but little from this part of the course (45)”.
This dilemma provided the impetus for Kelly to write ‘Operative
Gynecology’ with detailed illustrations by Brodel. Subsequently,
Brodel’s drawings became valuable educational tools for understanding
complicated anatomy and pathologyh .
_______________
c. Dr.Kelly is best known for his leadership
in three areas: as a founding faculty member of Johns Hopkins University
Medical School, as a physician who established high standards in
gynecology, and as one of the first clinicians to see the medical
potential of radium.
d. In a speech that Max gave for Kelly’s 75th birthday; “The
little I had learned in Leipzig was entirely inadequate. Gynecology
seemed a colossal subject, full of mysteries. It almost terrified
me. All I was able to do was to observe accurately, work hard, and
draw with fair technical skill, a meager equipment of my new task”.
e. Brodel became involved in medical research
and surgical procedures very early in his career. Following dissection
studies of the intrinsic blood vessels of the kidney he defined
an avascular line for nephrotomy (“Brodel White Line”)
and suggested a modified suture technique for nephropexy (“The
Brodel Stitch”).
f. Kelly made several contributions to gynecology
and was responsible for establishing it as a specialty at Johns
Hopkins Medical School. He invented many medical devices, notable
the urinary cytoscope as well as new surgical approaches in gynecology.
In addition, he was one of the first to attempt radium treatments
for cancer and to use absorbable sutures. Kelly was active in election
reform and also fought organized prostitution, working hard to rehabilitate
the “ladies”.
g. According to Howard Kelly; “Once
in Baltimore, two students exhumed a man. They boldly set him up
between them on a wagon seat and drove off. It was a chilly night;
and they stopped at an inn for a drink, leaving their silent company
propped against the wagon side…when a policeman made remarks
about the weather and the corpse answered not a word, the policeman
playfully prodded him in the stomach to make him speak. He was horrified
by a heavy body falling on him and an icy face being pressed to
his.”
h. Kelly acknowledged in the Preface of his
book that “the anatomical chapters were written by Max Brodel.

|
 |
 |
Funding the future Department of Medical Illustration
By 1903, Brodel’s work with Kelly achieved the highest praise
after the publication of the two volumes of ‘Operative Gynecology’.
Brodel received several enticing offers from other universities
in the United States and The Hopkins faculty was worried about the
possibility of losing the acclaimed artisti . It was
felt that medical illustration should be taught to others to ensure
the same kind of thoroughness among future medical artists (46).
Under the driving force of Thomas Cullen, an endowment was raised
to support a new venture to be named, “The Department of Art
as Applied to Medicine”, the first department of its kind
in the world (47). With personal persuasion and promise of funds,
Brodel remained at Johns Hopkins, and became the head of the new
department.
The endowment was a gift from Henry Walters (1848-1931), a wealthy
patron of the arts and founding donor of the Walters Art Museum,
that included contributions from J.P. Morgan and the W.B. Saunders
Company (48). When Cullen met with Walters in New York to accept
the funds, Walters stated: “I am not interested in medical
illustrations; I took twenty lectures in medicine at Harvard and
nearly vomited my boots up. However, I appreciate the value of medical
illustrations and will give the Department of Art as applied to
Medicine $5,000 per year for three years” (49,50). Walters
wished to remain anonymous and wanted no public acknowledgement
of his generosity. With continuous persistence on Cullen’s
part to raise funds to support the department in 1921, Walters donated
a permanent endowment of $110,000 for the department (51).
Prior to the first endowment by Walters, Brodel established classes
in medical illustration with the consent and funding of Dr.Kelly.
According to Cullen, classes “had been started simply to help
medical students with a gift … but year by year, though it
was unofficial, they were drawing talented young artists to Baltimore”
(52). Cullen saw that his friend Max was training a new generation
of artists in his methods and saw a future in medical illustration.
Cullen recalls : “…so I lighted my corncob pipe, went
down to my tent by the shore – and dreamed up the new department,
the Johns Hopkins Department of Art as Applied to Medicine, the
first of its kind anywhere in the world” (53)j
. In 1911, the institute was opened to art students for training
in medical illustration.
The endowment ultimately led to the production of a legacy of illustrations
in several medical fields, notably Otolaryngology. As the department
of Medical Illustration gained recognition, other surgical specialties
requested Brodel’s services. The complex nature of head and
neck structures led to the popular use of surgical illustration
to visually explain organs, such as the ear, or the neurovascular
structures in the neck. Moreover, the immense detail and superior
aesthetic quality of the work made such illustrations advantageous
to photography, and easier for teaching surgical procedures.
One of Brodel’s earlier series depicted each step in a tonsillectomy,
as taught by surgeon Samuel Crowe (Figure 3A and B) (54).
Each frame focused on a different angle to obtain a clear view of
the various structures in the head and neck, while also incorporating
pathological details such as the palatine tonsil microanatomy and
microcirculation. When the tonsillectomy series met with success,
the famous Johns Hopkins surgeon William Halstead, asked Brodel
in 1917 to prepare an illustrated series showing the steps of a
thyroidectomy so the procedure could be taught to the residents
(Figure 4A and B).
Brodel also used illustration to visually communicate the common
surgical procedures used at the time and to celebrate the famous
surgeons at Johns Hopkins by including their face (Dr.Kelly) in
the illustrationk . Just before Harvey Cushing left Johns
Hopkins for Boston in 1912, Brodel portrays Cushing demonstrating
a transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, a procedure used to access the
pituitary gland, with an incandescent head lamp to illuminate the
surgical site, and a mouth retractor meant for insufflation anesthesia
(Figure 5) (55). In another illustration, Brodel portrays
a sagittal section of a hypophysectomy procedure showing the Killian
incision used in septoplasty, which is an operation done to correct
any defects or deformities of the nasal septum (Figure 6)
(56).
Brodel’s illustrations were also used to raise money to fund
the Otologic Research Laboratory of Drs. Samuel Crowe and Stacey
Guild in 1927 (57). A portfolio of drawings demonstrating the areas
of the temporal bone affected by otosclerosis, a degenerative disease
of the sound conducting bones in the ear, was shown to the DuPont
family members who themselves had a history of otosclerosis (Figure
7). These drawings were successful in raising funds for further
research and were published many years later in a pediatric otolaryngology
text in 1963, still referenced today (Figure 8, Figure 9 A,
B and C).
_______________
i. At the time, the Mayo clinic in Rochester,
Minnesota was attempting to recruit Brodel.
j. Johns Hopkins Medical School was founded
by William Henry Welch to train competent practitioners as well
as to provide a center for learning and original research.
k. Brodel incorporated illustrations of Howard
Kelly, a reference found in many of Brodel’s drawings. Sometimes
Brodel even portrayed himself as the patient in his drawings.

|
 |
 |
Max Brodel’s two
tone technique Prior to Brodel’s
arrival at Hopkins, photography was the primary medium for visually
explaining anatomy. Brodel recognized a role for photography and
how it could save him from spending endless hours in the operating
room. However, his intention was not to compete with the camera
in realistic or imitative quality (58). He believed that the process
before the execution was the most important part of creating an
illustration:
“The artist must first fully comprehend
the subject matter from every standpoint: anatomical, topographical,
histological, pathological, medical and surgical. From this accumulated
knowledge grows a mental picture, from which again crystallizes
the plan for the future drawing. A clear and vivid mental picture
must always precede the actual picture on paper (59).”
At the turn of the 20th century, representing tissue accurately
was a problem for medical artists. This dilemma was significant
in Brodel’s time since “no medium – pencil, crayon,
ink, watercolour, gouche, pastel or oil produced the sparkling highlights
that characterize wet, living tissue “(60). The challenge
lay in finding the perfect technique that would allow Brodel to
create highly detailed and visually descriptive work with accuracy
for teaching future surgeons.
Brodel was dissatisfied with the way in which the plastic-like
effect that oil, or acrylic paint masked tissue structures. Although
Brodel felt, “the conception of a picture is the all important
thing, not the plastic elaboration, the realism, or the technical
finish”, he struggled with the constraints that working with
certain medium presented (61). On one hand, painting with media
such as ink washes and watercolor allowed artists to ‘highlight
with white paint the areas that are meant to glisten or to leave
areas of white paper untouched by paint, thus allowing the texture
of the paper to play a role in the aesthetics of the image’(62).
On the other hand, ‘oil or acrylic paint or pastel creates
a more opaque solid seal, masking the texture of the paper, and
a uniform surface’ (63,64).
Faced with these limitations, Brodel used lithography as a means
making tissue seem alive. His ‘Carbon Dust and Stipple Board
Technique’ involved using a special paper (Ross Hand-Stippled
Paper No.8) surfaced with heavy white layers of chalk or china clayl
. Initially, Brodel would draw the image on tracing paper, and then
bring it into direct contact with the stipple board to leave an
imprint of the desired image. Generally, the drawing was not made
directly on the Ross board in order to maintain its freshness for
the final work up. Once the imprint was made, carbon dust was layered
in stages to create the sense of depth, background and tonal gradation.
The illusion of structures being three dimensional was then created
by using an eraser to lift highlights and soften the edges of structures.
Fine and precise details were then engraved with the tip of the
scalpel blade and with fine dark lines using black watercolor or
carbon pencil (65). The overall effect created striking differences
between lights and darks (Figure 2).
Brodel’s art is noted by Crosby and Cody to have three hallmark
features. First, Brodel’s lines are delicate and painterly.
Second, carbon dust creates silvery, soft light which provides transition
between lights and darks. This creates the feeling that his subjects
are looming out of a transparent shadow. Third, his work has a strong
sense of depth and very fine detail. Overall, the final result of
his two-tone technique conveys the authenticity of a classic black
and white photograph, but with more detail and expression than a
photograph conveys (66,67).
_______________
l. Once Max discovered this method, it became
the mainstay of his work, along with pen and ink on scratchboard
and more rarely because of the expense of color reproduction, watercolor
on paper or on the Ross board. “The first drawings I made
on this paper were very crude, but I was sure of its possibilities
from the start. It gave me the effect I wanted and it save me much
time. There were many minor points in the working of this technique
which I discovered from time to time.”

|
 |
 |
The use of art in medical education
The earliest historical account of when art and medicine were used
as a tool for learning was on ancient cavern walls where animals
were crudely drawn with arrows and spears directed at the heart
to teach other hunters how to survive (68). For the Chinese, anatomical
drawings on tablets, and columns were the only means of learning
about human structure since both moral and civil law prevented them
from dissecting bodies (69). Aristotle was probably the first individual
to use the anatomical illustration of animals to teach anatomy to
his pupils (70).
Some art historians believe the Renaissance period marks the initial
merging of art and medicine where anatomists and physicians required
the help of artists to illustrate the anatomy of cadavers to further
anatomical learning (71). For artists, becoming a free lance medical
illustrator was a means to make a living, whereas for the physician,
medical illustration was useful for education. By the post-Renaissance
period, the companionship between art and medicine was consummated,
and the artist and the physician realized that their specialties
were useful in combination with that of the printer (72,73). Vesalius’s
De Humani corporis fabrica libri septem, published in 1543
by Johannes Oporinus in Basel, is both a classic work in the field
of medicine and a classic example of the art of printing (74)m .
Although medical illustration was historically used to educate
students, it was not always accurate. Errors occurred, mainly because
the anatomy of animals was studied and then extrapolated to represent
human structures. However, the Renaissance treatises misunderstood
that Galen (129-200 AD) had done dissections from animals rather
than humans (75). Netter (1906-1991) himself misrepresented the
lateral dorsal nuclei incorrectly as being lateral instead of medial
(76). Netter (1953) portrayed just eleven nuclei in each thalamus
instead of approximately forty nuclei (77). These are two examples
of how errors and oversimplifications can be handed down through
generations of print. Brodel was exceptional, partly because he
used first-hand information acquired by dissecting his own cadavers
to learn about anatomy and thus improved the standards in America
(78,79).
Traditional illustration and computerized images can co-exist,
and in fact, mutually aid one another in medical education. For
example, video-assisted surgery seems to be synergistically working
with traditional illustration in the current curriculum to enhance
the surgical learning experience for students (80). The concept
of Websurg was launched by Jacques Marescaux and his team
at the European Institute of TeleSurgery in Strasbourg, France and
then adopted by McMaster (2001) in order to provide medical teaching
centers with information on the latest surgical breakthroughs and
the possibility to chat with experts from all over the world. With
this in mind, McMaster University created the “World Electronic
Book of Surgery” which includes the latest techniques and
lectures in Cardiovascular, Gynecological, Thoracic, and Urological
surgery (81). The advantage of Websurg is that it’s
free, anyone can sign up, and it can be accessed from anywhere in
the world through the Internet (82). Brodel may have not taken to
the computer since it replaces the authenticity of hand-drawn images.
Today, knowledge that was once confined to the medical profession
is being made available to the public through exhibits such as Gunther
van Hagens “Body Worlds”. This exhibit displays whole
bodies that have been plastinated, and in a sense frozen in time,
so viewers can learn about the intricacies of the human body and
its complex functions. Just as medical illustration was used for
educating physicians in training, “Body Worlds” is used
as a tool for communicating the effects of unhealthy living to the
general public (83).
According to the President at the first annual meeting of the Association
of Medical Illustrators in 1946; motion picture photography
was “destined to play a far more important role in medical
education than it does now” (84)n . “It is generally
agreed by educators, as well as producers that the major development
of educational films of the future will be in the field of animation”
(85). However, some maintain that “motion picture photography
has been pushed about as far as it will go and artists must carry
on from here” (86). Sixty years later, web animation has not
replaced the role of surgical illustration in education even though
many feared it would. In fact, web-based learning has only enhanced
our preexisting methods for educating students on clinical procedures
and functional anatomy. A century later, Brodel’s achievements
remain relevant.
Brodel headed the department at Johns Hopkins University until
1939 and died in 1941 of metastatic pancreatic cancer. The ‘Brodel
Archives’ at John Hopkins store most of his artistic work
and an uncompleted manuscript (87). His drawings have been reproduced
in numerous textbooks, articles, and advertisements for over half
a century. Brodel was a true artist who “revolutionized medical
illustration in the United States and Canada during his forty eight
years in Baltimore” (88,89). Today, there are a dozen schools
patterned after the Brodel-Hopkins school, many pioneered by Brodel’s
former pupils such as, Dorcas Hager Padget, (1906-1973), a neurosurgical
and embryological illustrator; James F. Didusch, (1890-1955), an
embryological illustrator; William P Didusch, (1895-1981), a neurological
illustrator; and Leon Schlossberg, (1912-1999), a cardiology and
general illustratoro . Illutrators today complete a three
year course of study, much of it being tied in with a medical course.
The idea was to create professionals with an exceptional scientific
background, and to be accomplished artists (90).
_______________
m. At the time he wrote the Fabrica, Andreas
Vesalius was a lecturer in surgery at the University of Padua. The
Fabrica is a large folio volume of 663 pages, illustrated with more
than two hundred woodcuts. There is no other medical text that has
been accorded so high a rank in both fields; the art of medicine
and the art of printing, at once.
n. According to the constitution’s
objectives for the association; “The objectives of the Association
are to promote the study and to encourage the advancement of medical
illustration and allied fields of visual education; to advance medical
education, and to promote understanding and cooperation with the
medical and related professions.”
o. One of the most famous pupils who attended
Brodel’s classes was Harvey Cushing, at that time Associate
Professor of Surgery. He had a talent for drawing and later became
a close friend of Brodel.

|
 |
 |
References
- Tsafrir J., Ohry A. Medical Illustration: from caves to cyberspace.
Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2001:88:99-109.
- Petrucelli, RJ. Art and science. In: Lyons, A.S. &
Petrucelli, R.J. (eds) Medicine: an illustrated history.
New York: Abradale Press, 1987: 398-419.
- Calkins, C.M., Franciosi J.P. & Kolesari, G.L. Human anatomical
science and illustration: the origin of two inseperable disciplines.
Clinical Anatomy. 1999:12; 120-9.
- Tsafrir J., Ohry A. Medical Illustration: from caves to cyberspace.
Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2001:88:99-109.
- Thornton and Reeves. A short history: Medical book
illustration. The Oleander Press, 1983, England:15-17.
- Jones, Thomas. The Evolution of Medical Illustration.
In: Davis, David J. Essays in the History of Medicine,
Davis Lecture Committee, University of Illinois Press, Illinois,
1965:158-167.
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999:86; 113-115.
- Calkins, C.M., Franciosi J.P. & Kolesari, G.L. Human anatomical
science and illustration: the origin of two inseperable disciplines.
Clinical Anatomy. 1999:12;120-9.
- Tsafrir J., Ohry A. Medical Illustration: from caves to cyberspace.
Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2001;88:99-109.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Richter, I.A. The Notebooks of Leonardo DaVinci.
Oxford:OUP, 1952:150,371.
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999:86; 113-115.
- Schultheiss, D., Truss M.S., Jonas U., Engel R.M. Max Brodel
and Modern Medical Illustration. The Journal of Urology.
1999:161 (4S), Suppl;April:189.
- Crosby, Cody. Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Lucey B.P, Bedell Thomas C., Hutchins G.M. Max Brodel: Illustrating
Healed Valve Ring Abscess. Archives of Pathology &
Laboratory Medicine. 2005:Sept, 129:9;1155.
- Ibid
- Crosby, Cody. Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Lucey B.P, Bedell Thomas C., Hutchins G.M. Max Brodel: Illustrating
Healed Valve Ring Abscess. Archives of Pathology &
Laboratory Medicine. 2005: Sept, 129:9;1155.
- Flexner S., and Flexner J.T. William Henry Welch and
the heroic age of American medicine. Dover Publications,
Inc., New York.1941:224-226.
- Crosby, Cody. Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid.
- Ibid
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999:86; 113-115.
- Crosby, Cody. Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Robson, Judith. Tom Cullen of Baltimore. Oxford
University Press, London;1949:212.
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999:86;113-115.
- Crosby, Cody. Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999:86;113-115.
- Koehler B.M., Roderer N.K., Ruggere C. A short history of the
Willian H.Welch Medical Library. Neurosurgery.
2004:Vol.54:465-479.
- Ibid
- Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement
3: 1941-1945. American Council of Learned Societies, 1973.
- Kelly, H.A. Out of Uncertainty and Doubt, into Faith.
Rare Archives from the Hannah Collection, 1910.
- Kelly, Howard. The Barred Road to Anatomy. John Hopkins
Hospital Bulletin, Volume XIX, No.208, July 1908. Read
at the meeting of the John Hopkins society, October 14, 1907.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Kelly, H.A. Methods of Teaching Gynecology. Reprinted from
The Philadelphia Medical Journal on medical education,
September 1st, 1900.
- Loechel W.E. The History of Medical Illustration.
The Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1960;Apr;48:168-71.
- Papel Ira D. Max Brodel’s contributions to otolaryngology
– Head and Neck surgery. The American Journal of
Otology, 1986; Vol.7;6:460-469.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Cullen TS : Remarks at the Dinner Given by the W.B. Saunders
Co. on the Occasion of its Fiftieth Anniversary in Honor of Max
Brodel. Philadelphia, March 4, 1938.
- Robson, Judith. Tom Cullen of Baltimore. Oxford
University Press, London, 1949:210-223.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Papel Ira D. Max Brodel’s contributions to otolaryngology
– Head and Neck surgery. The American Journal of
Otology, 1986; Vol.7;6:460-469.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Lucey B.P, Bedell Thomas C., Hutchins G.M. Max Brodel: Illustrating
Healed Valve Ring Abscess. Archives of Pathology &
Laboratory Medicine. 2005;Sept, 129:9;1155.
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Ibid
- Loechel W.E. The History of Medical Illustration.
The Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1960;Apr;48:168-71.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Tsafrir J., Ohry A. Medical Illustration: from caves to cyberspace.
Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2001;88:99-109.
- Loechel W.E. The History of Medical Illustration.
The Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1960;Apr;48:168-71.
- Calkins, C.M., Franciosi J.P. & Kolesari, G.L. Human anatomical
science and illustration: the origin of two inseperable disciplines.
Clinical Anatomy. 1999:12; 120-9.
- Loechel W.E. The History of Medical Illustration.
The Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1960;Apr;48:168-71.
- Herrlinger R. History of Medical Illustration: from
antiguity to 1600. Editions Medicina Rara Ltd., New York;
1970:103.
- Loechel W.E. The History of Medical Illustration. The
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 1960;Apr;48:168-71.
- Bogen J.E. A half century of perpetuating Netter’s anatomic
error. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences.
2006:15:53-55.
- Ibid
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology. 1999;86;113-115.
- Tsafrir J., Ohry A. Medical Illustration: from caves to cyberspace.
Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2001;88:99-109.
- Guttman GD. Animating functional anatomy for the web. The
Anatomical Record. 2000:Apr 15: 261(2):57-63.
- http://www.websurg.com
- Ibid
- http://www.bodyworlds.com
- Jones, T. Launching of the Association of Medical Illustrators.
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.
1947:Jan;35:1:58-66.
- Ibid
- Ibid
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology.1999;86;113-115.
- Robson, Judith. Tom Cullen of Baltimore. Oxford
University Press, London, 1949:210-223.
- Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement
3: 1941-1945. American Council of Learned Societies, 1973.
- Poston, W.R. Book Review: Max Brodel: the man who put art into
medicine. Surgical Neurology.1994:42; 362-6.

|
 |
 |
Footnotes
- Bulbulian A.H. Art in the Service of Anatomy. Bulletin
of the Medical Library Association.1961:April; 49:2:178-186.
- Flexner S., and Flexner J.T. William Henry Welch and
the heroic age of American medicine. Dover Publications,
Inc., New York, 1941.
- The National Library in Medicine: Current Biographies
in Medicine. Howard Atwood Kelly. World of Health. Gale
Group, 2000.
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991:50.
- Schultheiss, D., Truss M.S., Jonas U., Engel R.M. Max Brodel
and Modern Medical Illustration. The Journal of Urology.
1999:161 (4S), Suppl:April;189.
- Lucey B.P, Bedell Thomas C., Hutchins G.M. Max Brodel: Illustrating
Healed Valve Ring Abscess. Archives of Pathology &
Laboratory Medicine.2005; Sept, 129:9;1155.
- Kelly, Howard. The Barred Road to Anatomy. John Hopkins
Hospital Bulletin, Volume XIX, No.208, July 1908. Read
at the meeting of the John Hopkins society, October 14, 1907.
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.
- Flexner S., and Flexner J.T. William Henry Welch and
the heroic age of American medicine. Dover Publications,
Inc., New York, 1941:72
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology.1999;86; 113-115.
- Crosby R.W, Cody J. Max Brodel: the man who put art
into medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991:49.
- Herrlinger R. History of Medical Illustration: from
antiguity to 1600. Editions Medicina Rara Ltd., New York;
1970:103.
- Jones T. Launching of the Association of Medical Illustrators.
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.1947;
Jan;35(1):58-66.
- Schultheiss D., Udo J. Max Brodel (1870-1941) and Howard A.Kelly
(1858-1943) – Urogynecology and the birth of modern medical
illustration. European Journal of Obstetrics & gynecology
and Reproductive Biology.1999;86;113-115.

|
 |

©2006 Pia Pace-Asciak, B.A.,
H.B.Sc., M.A.Sc.
|